| Aeolus451 said: It would cost MS more to moneyhat while it would cost Sony less. To the bolded part, you're exaggerating in the hopes that a sensible concept somehow becomes ridiculous all of a sudden. Very much like you did before. You were quoted multiple times in that other thread but you didn't respond to any of it but except for one. After the very end of your reply "This thread is a joke already though with all the insults, Im out". You knew more than one person responded to your first post and you read those. Your first post in that thread showed exactly how rational you wanted to discuss things and other users responded to you in kind. Trillions sounds so rational of you. |
I have no doubts there are situations where it would cost MS more to get something than Sony. And vice versa. The idea that due to userbase difference Sony automatically gets some massive discount on deals though is just silly.
I was engaged with one user in that thread, and read his first reply. Didn't read any others, hope that helps. If you wanna discuss the other thread so much, maybe go to that thread? I think it's still going. I didn't leave that thread to discuss it in another.
