So what do you think, did MS have as much new content at Gamescom as they had at E3?

[Robert_Downey_Jr.]

Sharpryno said:

JNK said:
Well everything they showed was labelled as "world premiere", which was pretty ridiclous because 90% of the stuff wasnt.

If their definition of "world premiere" is, that they show new gameplay thats even more ridiclous. I dont remember that any company has ever shown old gameplay at one of their conferences. Would be extremly boring to see gameplay thats already available on youtube scince weeks.

So yeah, it was new gameplay. Something that should be expected on something like gamescom.
Nothing but halo wars 2 was a world premiere. Nothing else was "new"

World premiere meaning what you are watching right now is the first time the world has ever seen it.  You could have showed a different part of a game earlier, then release new gameplay video no one has seen before and call it world premiere.  

I mean its not like Phil's tweet was far off.  They did show a lot of new stuff including games and features.   Fifa 16 demo on Xbox first, Homefront beta on xbox first, that qualifies as new content.  

A lot of you guys choose to be bitter for not reason.  Do not understand why.  That was easily MS's best gamescom in its history. 

I hope for their sake that's not true.  You're using it ust as loosly as they did.  As JNK said you normally only say "world premiere" when showing a new game.  Normally companies say "gameplay premiere" or "exclusive content" when showing the things they did.  I mean honestly when do companies show the same gameplay they've shown before at another conference?   By that definition basically every conference has "world premieres" on virtually everything they show lol