FJ-Warez said:
swyggi said:
FJ-Warez said:
swyggi said:
FJ-Warez said:
swyggi said:
Basically, the reason Nintendo was going down in the dumps at that time is because of their third-party issue. I don't think that will happen to either MS or Sony since they allow more third parties to grow financially than Nintendo.
|
Please show us a prove of this... I'm curious... (I'm saying this based on two things, the success of the DS + the strong thir party support, and the dev cost of the PS3/360+high budget tittles) |
I'm talking about consoles in the past and now as opposed to handhelds. But just take a look at this: http://vgchartz.com/worldtotals.php?name=&console=DS&publisher=&sort=Total Take a look at the top half. Then take a look at any Sony or MS system's million sellers. |
So your proff is the success of Nintendo??? Where is the proff to this "MS or Sony allow more third parties to grow financially than Nintendo" ??
|
http://vgchartz.com/worldtotals.php?name=&console=PS2&publisher=&sort=Total All you need to do is go to million sellers on vgchartz and highlight the platform you want to see the highest sold games on each system. |
So, your proof now are more graphics, were is the real proof of financial grow???? Btw, if a game doesn't sell well in "X" console, do you blame the console maker?? or the dev??? |
What the....where did graphics come from in this discussion? The MILLION SELLERS list I showed you shows the amount of third party developers that had a lot of success on the PS2.
Your last question depends on the variables involved such as games released during when said developers game released, possible technical problems etc.
