| StarOcean said: DS was, like another user said, a gamble and paid off. The 3DS milked off that gamble and worked out well but obviously the "WOW!" factor of the OG DS had long worn off by then. The DS was the better of the 2. Not to downplay the 3DS's success, but it's success was nothing compared to what came before it. Personally, I think the next Nintendo handheld could reach numbers closer to the DS than 3DS if they are able to create another risky, innovative, and moderately priced handheld -also kill the DS family. That'll be the only way to truly make another huge success... but Nintendo probably won't take that risk, and I totally get why, but still ![]() |
not necassarly, innovative doesn't have to be left field. changing the form factor to tablet or handheld console, adding a feature thats interesting but not to out of the box thinking. there are ways to be innovative without "oh my good god youve changed everything two screens, touch screen, what!!"








