By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
De85 on 03 May 2008
Edit Thread
Viper1 said:
De85 said:
BCNR34 said:
Viper1 said:
I like the notion that the Wii will receive better 3rd party support because of its position in the market space. The fact itself that it's leading is indifferent.

i think you mean more 3rd party support, and more doesn't mean better.


QFT, I think this to myself everytime the Wii boys start to go off about how 3rd party support for the Wii is increasing. It may be getting more, but the games I am interested in just aren't there. That's why I'm happy with my 360, even if it ends up last in sales.


Excuse me but you mean to tell me that you don't think the quality of 3rd party games for Wii would be better if Wii stays in the lead than had it been in last place this whole time?


 That depends on if you're talking about the average overall quality, or the quality of a select few titles, but in general I think you're misunderstanding me.  Of course there will be a gem here and there, but I think the shovelware epidemic will only increase to go with them.  The 3rd party games available for the PS3 and 360, while fewer in number, are much better in terms of quality.  This is due to the fact that more expensive development means developers must be much more selective about the games they choose to produce, and exert the maximum possible effort to make the game good.  Consequently the PS3 and 360 get brilliant games like Uncharted and Bioshock, while the Wii gets Pet Catz, Dogz, Horsez, etc...