By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GTstation on 27 July 2015
Edit Thread
pokoko said:
GTstation said:


Im saying he has names but not a single truely great fighter in his prime.

Dlh and Suger were old geezers at the time of their figths, both in their prime would have handed him his ass.  Gatti and HAooton woudl retire 2 years after their figths with him, no chance in hell were they in their prime vs him.  Castillo was finished multiple times before fighting may, Zab is easliy a neevr was he had the potential but never got hsi shit right and lived up to it.  

So, what, it's Mayweather's fault that De La Hoya and Mosley weren't at their prime when they fought?  What was he supposed to do, climb into a time machine?  All the first names on that list are actually the guys Mayweather was supposed to fight, as they were the best fights he could get at the time.  He was the up and coming guy that was trying to make a name.  Supposedly, Mosley didn't want to fight him back then.

It's a list of guys that are #1 ranked and titleholders and you're saying what?  No, they weren't in their prime, he should have fought ... who?  If he didn't fight those guys then he really would have been ducking the guys at the top.  But he shouldn't have fought them?

The justifications are just ridiculous.  He's not supposed to fight Judah, who was highly regarded at the time, because he wouldn't do much later?  He's not supposed to fight the super popular and undefeated Hatton because Hatton would get nearly killed a couple years later and retire?

Pacquiao fought De La Hoya, Mosley, and Hatton after Mayweather, why isn't he persecuted for that?  It makes no sense.

Yes its his fault hes ducked top prime opposition to take on done names, they were the popualr easy figths far from the best.  

To prove how big a joke he is now its Berto, hes fighting Berto LMAO cant wait for you to spin this shit.