JEMC said:
But even if they go with a cheap VR solution, the first Oculus Rift units like the one you used were sold for $300. Sure, if Nintendo made them, the cost would go notably down (mass production, cheaper prices, etc.), but that would still put it at someling like $100-150. And then you have to add the cost of the console, another $150-200. The result is another expensive (by Nintendo standarts) machine that, as Iwata or Miyamoto said, is the last thing they want to do.
Also. let's not forget that Nintendo is linked mostly to kids, and the use of the a 3D screen already caused some minor controversy about it and how would that affect the kids. Imagine what would happen if they go with VR, that implies putting a screen a few inches away from a kids eyes! |
The technology of VR isn't that expensive. The original oculus rift used a basic mobile phone screen and better screens now are super cheap. Entry level quad core phones with 1080p screens are about £100 or less. This is something that Nintendo could achieve. To be honest its the only thing that comes to mind as a possibility for being a runaway hit that could sell 20 million easily in the first year. VR doesn't have to have state of the art graphics. The VR experience itself will add hugely to the playability. The feeling of immersion with VR is amazing and I'm quite happy with the VR world being a cartoon nintendo style world rather than a VR world with realistic graphics.