Hawk said:
Kirby?! You're back! In all seriousness, you don't have to create these threads. If I have an issue with a ban, I see no reason to take it up with anyone else but the mod. Nor do I care to see other people always bring up their issues with a ban. @Flow, this is a privately owned site. Certainly the owner and who he gives power to moderate have say on what happens. I'm not sure why anyone would think a privately owned site should be a democracy. |
I'll say the same thing i said to nordlead but allow me to be clearer
I am not saying this is a democracy.
And now allow me to copy and past so this time someone may get my point...
"Sqrl said: "You can debate them in a topic the same as anyone else""
Oh really? Then why the thread was locked and the creator was threatened with a ban? And it's not the first time i see it happening.
I don't care to captainpreferences, a mod threatened the creator of the topic who didn't even offended somebody, he just wanted to know why captainpreferences was banned and i think it's fair since the ban reason is misleading.
And you don't need to make a thread about each offense, but why not point out when you find a ban unfair? The creator of the thread thought captainpreferences was banned solely for being a sony fanboy.
I remember when ioi started showing the content of banned people posts to everyone, he said it was for we to have the right to judge if a ban is fair or not.

Flow -"The important is to pwn other ppl"







