Sqrl said:
Ding Ding! This is absolutely a dictatorship, these people are put in charge and what they say goes. We have no recourse and the reason people continue to come & post is because we have reasonable overlords who don't abuse their power (too much You can debate them in a topic the same as anyone else, the only difference is that they have the added responsibility of swinging down the ban hammer on those who get out of hand. In the case of CaptainPreference he had it coming for a lot more than just that post, in fact I think I counted 3 other posts that were ban worthy given his history as a troll on the site. Ironically I was reporting him for one of those other posts as DKII was banning him, and I PM'd DKII hoping he would extend the ban...which he didn't because he is a nice overlord. You don't see me making a thread about each offense and wanting people's opinions about whether he should have been banned longer...so why should we have the opposite? If you have a problem just PM the mod, they are quite reasonable if you are. |
Oh really? Then why the thread was locked and the creator was threatened with a ban? And it's not the first time i see it happening.
I don't care to captainpreferences, a mod threatened the creator of the topic who didn't even offended somebody, he just wanted to know why captainpreferences was banned and i think it's fair since the ban reason is misleading.
And you don't need to make a thread about each offense, but why not point out when you find a ban unfair? The creator of the thread thought captainpreferences was banned solely for being a sony fanboy.
I remember when ioi started showing the content of banned people posts to everyone, he said it was for we to have the right to judge if a ban is fair or not.
@nordlead
Sorry, by dictatorship i meant abusing power, and even if there wasn't power abuse it wouldn't be a democracy :P

Flow -"The important is to pwn other ppl"








).