By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lortsamler on 21 July 2015
Edit Thread
ShadowofYahrnam said:
Lortsamler said:


I didn't say i am for this. I personally hope EA Access will never succeed,because then we have that situation you explain here. The sad thing,is that most people don't seem to get that.

Yes, god forbid Activision, Ubisoft or Bethesda decided to follow suit and offered 12+ games, 10% off along with early access for $2.50 a month!  That would be horrible!  I would have to spend upwards of $10 a month for 50+ games!  

PSNow, on the other hand, allows me to stream 8 year old games, with terrible input lags, straight to my PS4 or other approved device for just $20 a month!  Lets all support Sony on this so the future of gaming doesn't involve hardware in the house, rather a monthly subscription to play all our games!  

You people are hilarious (and extremely hypocritical).  You would defend Sony no matter what they decided for us.  I would love to have the OPTION to sign up for EA Access.  But when I think about it I guess you're right, it's good that Sony made the choice for me and I'll support that so they give me less options in the future as well.  

No,i am not defending Sony at all. What i fear is that this will be a growing trend with every company,and don't you belive for a second that the price will still be low if that's the only option you got in the future,and the business modell where you could buy a single copy of a game either on disc or digital is long gone.  PS Now is fundamentally different,because you don't even need to own a console to use the service,so you can't compare it. And just for the record,i don't like the idea of streaming games like with PS Now at all!