By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ShadowofYahrnam on 21 July 2015
Edit Thread
Lortsamler said:
Faelco said:


If it succeeds, Ubisoft, Activision, Square Enix, Bethesda and others will do the same and soon/next gen, we will have to pay 20-30 dollars a month to play the "full experience" of all our games (DLC, multiplayer, release date... anything can be included). Playstation players have the right to doubt IMO... XBox players payed to play online without saying anything and now we need to pay too, because it's "normal". Even Nintendo does DLCs now because it became "normal" in the industry. If we accept anything, then our industry can become anything. 

 

It's great. 


I didn't say i am for this. I personally hope EA Access will never succeed,because then we have that situation you explain here. The sad thing,is that most people don't seem to get that.

Yes, god forbid Activision, Ubisoft or Bethesda decided to follow suit and offered 12+ games, 10% off along with early access for $2.50 a month!  That would be horrible!  I would have to spend upwards of $10 a month for 50+ games!  

PSNow, on the other hand, allows me to stream 8 year old games, with terrible input lags, straight to my PS4 or other approved device for just $20 a month!  Lets all support Sony on this so the future of gaming doesn't involve hardware in the house, rather a monthly subscription to play all our games!  

You people are hilarious (and extremely hypocritical).  You would defend Sony no matter what they decided for us.  I would love to have the OPTION to sign up for EA Access.  But when I think about it I guess you're right, it's good that Sony made the choice for me and I'll support that so they give me less options in the future as well.