BMaker11 said:
it's the same logic to say MS won because Sony showed stuff you, personally, didn't care for, even though an overwhelming majority care more for them than they did for MSs announcements. |
I think this is one of the key points this thread is meant to be about.
In a post where you've called for Ludicrous to be 'objective' (already a bit strange given we're talking about games!), you've strayed from that goal yourself.
The statistics used in the OP do not appear to be all-encompassing. Others have pointed out potential flaws in the methodology used. But ultimately its part of a slew of evidence that positives/negative reactions to the MS/Sony conferences in general were not nearly as one-sided as a quick perusal of the VGC forums would lead one to believe.
@ those who are saying "MS couldn't have won E3, because its still being outsold."
If your metric for E3 victory is determined by the need for an abrupt and total realignment of console trends, you're probably wasting your time participating in threads like these.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS







