It's quite different from my perspective
Azzanation said:
Benefits of owning Digital
No Discs
Cheaper Consoles (No disc drives required)
Faster load times
Less house space
Access to entire Library
Cheaper games
Able to download games on any machine (account based)
No Discs/Drive maintenance
Benefits of owning Physical
Install off the disc
Ownership of a game
Resale Value
Now those reasons to own physical aren’t exactly great compared to the reasons to own digital and if you’re someone who loves your games and don’t plan on reselling them, it sort of makes it useless. The fact you need an online account now to use your hardware and half of the game is only accessible online now with paywalls has really made it pointless to own it on disc in my opinion.
If anyone wants to add to my list feel free, I know there’s more with physical but I just can’t think of any.
|
Other benefits of physical is the extras. The witcher 3 came with a useful map and some other goodies.
As I already said, easier to keep the M-rated games out of reach of my kids.
It feels a lot nicer to put a new game in the machine than to wait for a download. With a digital library I just keep looking at what else is there, hence my Steam library is mostly unplayed. Having to get up to change games has its benefits! (I have the same problem with Netflix. Stick in a blu-ray and I watch it all the way, watch of Netflix and I'll be browsing for something better 20 minutes in)
The biggest reason is still trust. Having a physical copy of the game guarantees ownership. Digital I'm not so sure. It's also easier to keep a physcial library. Steam is nice, yet I also have games on Origin, GoG and a bunch direct from developers, leaving me with a bunch of accounts and passwords to keep track of. I'm kinda over digital, it got too messy for my liking.