It boils down to this: When M$ was dominant, they wanted games ( I thought it was only indie/Arcade games) to release on their console on day one of first or have additional content. If not, they didn't want it released at all.
I personally can't think of any game that released later with any content. People feel this was bad.
On the other hand, we have Sony who had no such deal as far as we know. Still, people can make several games that released later with added content (and a few times like Lost Planet were the game had no bonus AND ran worse).
Which side do you fail on? Because if it was bad for M$ then, is bad for Sony now. If it was good for M$ then, it's good for PlayStation gamers now. It doesn't matter if the bonus was good, bad, or ugly. According to what we read, it only applied to what was ON THE DISC. Console exclusive Dlc wasn't taken into consideration.
