The Parity Clause is dead, long live the Parity Clause!

[mornelithe]

beeje13 said:

mornelithe said:

*snore*  I actually trust...you know, the devs, over a person on a forum who's clearly not been paying attention for the past 10 years.

 

http://gamingbolt.com/sony-has-certain-parity-policies-as-well-microsofts-indie-requirements-are-not-unreasonable-dev

Well at least read what that person on a forum says and you will notice I say nothing that contradicts that article, even if it is from gamingbolt. 

P.S. That's if you were replying to me. Sorry for my tone if not!

Nah, I was responding to Onyide, who's clearly ignoring all empirical evidence that supports the fact that Sony has a very similar clause.  The difference is, this isn't last gen, so Sony really doesn't need it.  Though, I wonder if Sony will require anything additional in the Tomb Raider game, after timed exclusivity ends.

Gaming Bolts may not be the best, but I was more pointing to the specific quotes from the dev, stating Sony has similar policies.