bobobologna on 02 May 2008
| eab said: I can see why a lot of people here get pissed off when these threads are made, but it has some point. If the PS3 costs more and its fans have been forever touting that their system is the best, the cell is unbeatable, its future proof, its far superior, it will have the best graphics of this gen, it whoops the 360 in performance tests, etc, etc, etc... Why the heck is the 360 version have better graphics I don't care if it's barely noticeable, the point remains. The 360 is a cheaper system and is using older technology. Why is the so called future proof PS3 falling behind graphically? |
Except that most reviewers agree that the PS3 version looks better. I haven't seen both versions in person, so I can't really comment on it, but most people seem to agree that the PS3 version has better lighting, filters, and effects.
