eab on 02 May 2008
I can see why a lot of people here get pissed off when these threads are made, but it has some point.
If the PS3 costs more and its fans have been forever touting that their system is the best, the cell is unbeatable, its future proof, its far superior, it will have the best graphics of this gen, it whoops the 360 in performance tests, etc, etc, etc...
Why the heck is the 360 version have better graphics
I don't care if it's barely noticeable, the point remains. The 360 is a cheaper system and is using older technology. Why is the so called future proof PS3 falling behind graphically?
