By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran said:
midrange said:


Because one has been in development solely for the Wii u for a long time, and the other is just plain good.

I don't get why you are trying to compare different games, with different art styles, with different developers, with different circumstances. That's like saying splatoon is shit compared to the highly rated Rayman legends. I'm sorry they didn't give your console version of choice more money, time, and attention compared to the other versions, but there is more to it than them being "lazy."

If every indie dev is able to make donkey kong tropical freeze type games, then Nintendo must be a shitty dev since their level of games match the level that should be expected of indie devs (by your logic).

This game looks bad on all versions. Not sure what the term "indie devs" has to do with quality. These are all experienced developers.

Stop hiding behind excuses and stop acting like I only care about Nintendo. You're not very good at reading people.

the game looks fine, I don't know why you are bashing it. Because you have seen better is not really a good reason. 

Am I suddenly hiding behind excuses for pondering why a developer may be having trouble with a port? Am, I wrong to not jump to conclusions and call them "lazy" and "incompetent"

And I linked you to Nintendo since you often like to use Nintendo's games as benchmarks for whether a game is good or whether a developer is trying, despite the fact that Nintendo will always have an advantage in making games on the wii u.