Mr Puggsly said:
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
Mr Puggsly said:
You've somehow misconstrued my post.
I'm basically saying Sony would have crushed any competition unless it was a big company that was willing to throw money around like Sony.
MS spent a lot of money to challenge Sony directly, not many were willing to do that.
|
oh I see. Still I think Nintendo took risks and was doing fine financially to challenge Sony. I'm not that big into online stuff which is mainly what we have to thank MS for as far as consoles go. I also kinda loathe them for making two weapon limits and regen health a standard in FPS games due to their most popular franchise always going that route. Oh well at least online folks can enjoy their advancement in that area of the industry and there are other genres for me to enjoy than FPS
|
I feel with N64 and beyond Nintendo decided to focus gaming experiences Sony wasn't offering or didn't do as well. Hence, Nintendo got the hell out the way of Sony. SNES was the Playstation of the 4th gen. Nintendo became something else after that.
MS came in wanting to take on Sony directly and had undeniable success. Even the people that hate Xbox should atleast admit they made Sony better because they forced them to work harder. I can't say Nintendo did the same. Even now Nintendo makes little effort to compete with Xbox and Playstation.
|
Still if you look at the sales of Goldeneye 007 mature games could do well on the N64. Very well.
