| generic-user-1 said:
and not destroying your nature because you can pay others to destroy theres is very pragmatic.. |
Pragamatism is when you're weighing up the risks, while you're in denial of the fact that current crisis will inevitably bring a great deal of energy-deficit regions to what UN indentifies as energy poverty if not hunger due to destruction of transportaion routes and decline in energy production, covering this by one fairy tale or another. Not the first time I talk about it with you and every time the explanation is different: first it was renewables, then it's p2g, now it's a "smart plan" and we just "do not want to drill holes in the ground because it's bad for the nature", then "we have coal" (where did the topic of nature suddenly go?). This lack of consistency is rather childish and makes me think if you're actually believe what you say.
