One of the main problems of MS' first party games

[Dark_Feanor]

ethomaz said:

Diversity is the biggest issue of MS.

Sony has more (even if you say not better) types of games and that appeal to more gamers than what MS has.

You will says Indies doesn't make difference but it makes because add diversity.

I see a lot of gamers liking Knack, Ryse and The Order... they are bad games in my opinion but there will be always people that love them... big end diversity is what made a bood library of the games.

PS2 was the king due these facts.

I thought we were talking about FIRST PARTY games here. I didn´t know that indies were first party.

For most of last generation (and still to this day) the 360 had way,way,way more indie games than the PS3. Does this FACT has any relevance now that we are discussing "diversity"? Would you say that the 360 had more "diversity" and thus Microsoft because of the overwelming quantity of top tier indies?

Or may be "diversity" only matters when we add all those obscure Japanease games that no one out side Japan. 

I´m also currious how you´d tell if a TYPE of game is BETTER than any other. Is RPG better than FPS? Well, probaly if it feets your narative... too bad Sony has no RPG franchise yet (may be Horizon will be classified as RPG)

PS:Do you think Dead Rising 3 and Sunset Overdrive are also bad games?