| RolStoppable said: After so many years it's still shocking how willfully people buy into third party excuses. Third party support isn't about horsepower, ease of programming or even sales. It's first and foremost driven by bias. |
I Have seen this from you multiple times, so I guess I got some statements and questions.
PS3 vvas hard to develop for but it had similar specs to 360 making certain games look the same an appealing thing. PS3 came off the back of PS2 success. And because of that vvould you not think that planning three years before the PS3 released to make games for it? VVii came off the sales flop Gamecube, so three years in advance they probably should not develop for the Gamecubes successor.
In addition the PS2 vvas still trucking along at this point in time. So games vvith similar control schemes (DS2, DS3, 360) could easily be made right?
PC games are also much closer to PS3 and 360 then the VVii.
Install base? 360 and PS3 alvvays ahead. PC+360+PS3? Therefore ahead, but PC is not knovvn. And idk if any PS2 games after 2006 didnt come out on just PS2 and 360. So likely PS2 helped PS3.
And many multiplat games for vvii, ps3, 360 sold vvorst on vvii.
I mean PS2 gen obvious, PS2 takes off after major PS1 gen therefore; not much support for competitors.
PS3 gen then maybe 3rd parties expected the same? VVith 3 year dev cycles that gets the PS3 set til 2009.
