By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sabvre42 said:
onionberry said:
sabvre42 said:

So your reasons are:
1.) Its stupid
2.) Billionare companies
3.) Crowdfunding

Mind putting those 3 items into an actual reason rather that has some defensible rationale? For all intents and purposes, they are offering access to a product on a "if x interest is generated you all get... if not ... no one gets charged" basis.

As I said in my last post, they are doing everything correctly within the Universal Code of Commerce and Contract law. They are offering a good or service in exchange for legal tender (consideration). What is wrong with this?

if you feel good about it then good for you, next time you'll fund the next walkman so be happy.
i

You still haven't given actual justification for your statements.

All I'm gathering from your posts is: Big company bad... big company must spend money on projects that it knows will sell (like CoD)... but big company also bad for only selling projects that it knows will sell.

I'm not saying that big companies are bad wtf, I'm saying "hey, consumers should not fund anything for billionaire companies" easy as that, you don't need any scientific maths to see the point. But if you feel good about it then be happy and don't worry.