starcraft said:
I guess we will wait and see then. You seem to think that I believe Killzone 2 will be horrible, and I do not. I just think that given the failings of the original, the constant 'pushing back' of 'assumed' release periods (as you don't like the word 'delay' ) and the trappings that come with a rapid expansion of the development team's size, there is a lot of clear doubt as to whether this will be the AAA title that Sony claims it will be. I forsee a decent, low-to-mid eighties shooter, with passable online and full marks for graphics.
|
Your constant reference of the Surfer Girl rumor (it's freakin' Surfer Girl) certainly points to that.
And, as I tried to point out, the original's failings weren't in gameplay so much as graphics and AI (the latter of which did affect singeplayer gameplay to an extent).
Although another complaint of the game was that it never quite had the scale of a major war (I seem to recall IGN's review of the original complaining about this specifically, and I noticed it while playing the game). Battles were often small, consisting of maybe 10 guys duking it out. The E307 (as well as the GDC07 trailer we never saw, as mentioned above) shows the complete opposite. The size of the battles in KZ2 will be quite immense.
I see a mid-80s game in all areas BUT graphics. The graphics will bring the game up to high 80s or low 90s, imo. Of course, I'd hope (and believe it is quite possible) that the game will be a 90s title across the board.
I remain cautiously optimistic about the title.