Ok, then everything is agreed.
Back to the problem of ID:
You can't form a theory on a negative statement.
For the sake of argument, lets assume that evolution is not true. Assuming i'm a creationist, I assert "evolution is false, therefore, creationism must be true."
That statement is not enough to form a scientific theory. Proving A is false doesn't automatically mean that B is true. Too many ID people play that card, and I think its a little annoying.








