padib said:
You need to read that in context. You mentioned that 5,6 year years didn't much apply and that 3,4 years would have been more accurate, but I mentioned that of 4 important upcoming games, two fit in that category, so 50% accuracy. Of course I don't think he's referring to the majority of games released in a decent gap between reveal and release. And that's why people can't accept that he might be right, because the meaning is distorted. He made a vague comment in a verbal interview, it would be illogical to think he was referring to the majority of games released within 2 years of reveal. |
if you have to pick 4 games to even be able to argue he was 50% right you already over half way to realizing how much of an exageration he made :) The thing is he didnt' say, what you are saying. He exagerated and you have to really reach to even get what you call a 50% acuracy. instead of trying to fill things in that weren't there to get 50% acuracy, accept he was wrong with his exageration and move on.