padib said:
Tachikoma said:
both project guard and project giant robot are intended to be retail games, not just tech demos, they are games with anticipated releases, as such they are games that have been shown early before the titles actual release.
3 years is a considerable amount of time, and the thing is, were not "comparing with sony" were assessing whether what reggie said was true or not, which is relative to nintendo not anyone else.
All of these games contradict his statement, fair enough zelda u is down to delays but then, if you're going to give special allowances for games releasing a certain time after they were initially shown on the strengths of delays alone, most games on other systems with expansive time periods between reveal and release would qualify for this allowance too.
|
No I agree with you, if Zelda is delayed then you have to paint everything by the same stroke. Problem is Zelda is expected to release in 2016, making it 2 years distance from reveal.
About the project games, they may or may not get retail releases. Both are projects and as projects their likelyhood to release is always in question.
Dunban67 said:
you do understand reggie did not not beleive what he was saying right? Don t try to defend his words when, if he was being intellectually honest he would not defend them himself- Iwata even said at the stockholders meeting that they will reveal games further away when it suits their purpose and reveal games on a shorter time frame when it suits their purpose- which is what any of the console makers will do- the difference is they will not act like they don t and take a jab at the other guys for doing the same thing
|
I'd be interested in seeing a link to that statement. Perhaps they are speaking from both sides of their mouths then, I am open to convincing arguments from anyone.
|
http://www.develop-online.net/news/metroid-prime-4-not-coming-to-wii-u/0208036
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-06-17-next-proper-metroid-prime-would-likely-now-be-on-nx
