By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mornelithe said:
Esiar said:

The burden of proof isn't logical in every circumstance. If one makes an orignal claim that someone didn't rob a store, and someone says otherwise, it's unfair that only the one saying he didn't rob has to try to prove their point. 

Although it is logical for a Theism vs Atheism argument.

Wouldn't it be equally illogical to make a claim that someone didn't rob a store, before any accusation has even been made?  Would that not raise more questions that answers?  What possible reason would someone have to defend themselves from a non-accusation?

They'd want to prove their innocense so no one could evens suspect them. But this has gotten off subject. All I said was that I have a feeling it might have been forced in, not that it is, and not that the game would be better with a male (I think the female makes more sense). Although my opinion has changed a bit since I started this thread. I don't the feminist, stererotype-breaking agenda is accurate anymore.



Can't wait for The Zelder Scrolls 3: Breath of The Wild Hunt!