mornelithe said:
They CAN be, but it's illogical to do so. Burden of proof rests with the person making the claim. |
The burden of proof isn't logical in every circumstance. If one makes an orignal claim that someone didn't rob a store, and someone says otherwise, it's unfair that only the one saying he didn't rob has to try to prove their point.
Although it is logical for a Theism vs Atheism argument.
Can't wait for The Zelder Scrolls 3: Breath of The Wild Hunt!







