nanarchy said:
Sorry but no. you don't seem to understand how the financial systems in place work. a default would probably be a great long term outcome, it would be a disasterous short term one. it isn't just people's money that becomes inaccessible. think about all the businesses, they can no longer access money or credit to pay staff. People no longer have money to spend on anything except essentials sending many businesses into a spiral of bankruptcy. Short term would see a massive spike in unemployment as well as crippling financial restrictions on much of the population and a mass excodus of investment (that part is already happening though). Think of the effects of lehman brothers but magnify them as there won't be a government to bail them out. |
well i think we have problems with short and long term, i mean 1-5 years with short and 20+ with long term.
and your descriptions doesnt sound like anything will change. and what investment should go on a mass exodus? the millionairs money in switzerland? or the last paycheck of the rest of the greeks?







