| mochachino said:
All the people saying he should live, OK, why don't you all get together and chip in to pay for his lifetime prison sentence. People shouldn't have to pay to feed this guy. When a person is undeniably guitly of a heinous and egregious crime, the public should not have to pay for their life-time prison sentence. If they can work out a way where he doesn't cost the public anymoney to incarerate, then let him live. |
Your right, people shouldn't have to pay for their life-time prison sentence but what we are paying for is the service of justice to be accoutable for our safety which is to say we are paying for safe neighborhoods. Someone said it perfect before in that the prisoners should effectively run jobs for the prison like cooking, cleaning, mail services, electrical and mechanical services. The less a prison costs, the better but it shouldn't come at the cost of public saftey.
