hansrob00 said:
midrange said:
No one buys a game to support a movement, if you do so, then that is sad. If I were to buy destiny, it would be because it is fun. If it also happens to have online only, oh well, the developer may have a good reason to do so (to combat hacking and modding for example). No one is forcing anyone to only buy games from ea or activision. I tend to buy games of all kinds, and I don't care who it comes from as long as it is fun
|
Well then, call me sad. I will resist this trend of turning games from something that own or at least you can use when you want, how you want, or for as long as you want vs. a service which includes using it only when you are lucky enough to log into the servers, for as long as it is profitable for them, and usually them billing you multiple times for less content, you know like a service.
|
I'm not calling you sad, I'm calling your decision sad if anything. You are avoiding great games based on a paranoic and baseless claim. No one is charging you multiple times for less content by offering you more paid dlc. If anything, the always online is a development decision, not a business decision. Think about it, if destiny had a local mode, the system and not a server would have to keep track of the progress, meaning the progress can be locally hacked so that the hacker can change the progress and get all the rare items. Is it fair that he logs back in with every rare item against people who play the game fairly?
