| ganoncrotch said: *gasps internally*
|
You're lost because you initially took us off course making a point that doesn't support your own argument and now you think I'm talking about review embargos when it clearly isn't the case. Your point was that you think consumers should be given a better sense of direction after a broken game is fixed and those broken reviews shouldn't remain but yet you feel that it is common sense that you should hold off on a game if it was a late embargo otherwise it will be broken or bad. My point is that if you think the average consumer needs updated reviews and can't use anything else to help direct them because they can't look at a bad review talking about issues at launch and see it as outdated then this average consumer isn't going to have the "common sense 101" (really?) to know how review embargos work and how they can point towards a bad or broken game.
