U.S. Supreme Court Votes Gay Marriage Constitutional and Legal

[generic-user-1]

reggin_bolas said:

I will reiterate my protest and I will maintain this posture until my last breath. There is nothing inherently discriminatory or prejudiced about NOT supporting gay marriage.

A neutral state has absolutely no interest in issuing marriage licenses for same-sex couples. It's only legitimate interest is maintaining the same for straight couples capable of reproducing. Marriage is an institution for the protection and establishment of the natural family as we know it conceptually from biology. Ersatz methods of procreation does not obviate this simple truth.

The Supreme Court enforced a popularity contest. What occured can be considered a judicial farce.

 

sure it does, who has to pay if a child loses his parents? the state. if the parents are a samesexcouple, ust one has to die make the parents lose the child to the system...  same goes for healthcare and when people get old ohh and now one spouse can get money from th othr after a divorce, so one less on foodstamps.

 

 

 

ohh and btw well played obama, now the people are freaking out about samesex marriage and not about obamacare, that ruling went under the radar after the samesex marriage, and people should be outraged by it.  obamacare will bleed the us dry because its a bad system,to much capitalism and to much benefits for the industrie.   europe has good working healthcare systems and they are all cheap, heavily regulated and mostly staterun.