McDonaldsGuy said:
palou said:
I do not believe that punishment should be, in any way or form, goal of the justice system. The goal of all forms of government should be to search ideal life conditions for all people, including criminals. Punishing purely for revenge is counterproductive to this, and for me, is higly unmoral.
I do not believe that a death sentence would impede other individuals of committing similar acts, over a life sentence, quite the contrary, in fact. Many religious extremists consider death to be more honourable than being captured; anyone afraid of death awould not participate in these activities in the first place, considiring the high risk (and examples of this risk, such as the other brother.)
I thus believe the death sentance to be both unethical and counterproductive. |
This really made me angry - you just basically said his victims mean nothing. It's "immoral" to kill him yet perfectly OK for him to place a bomb near an 8 year old to blow up. Unreal.
|
Why form your arguement by putting words into peoples mouth's? Just because its immoral to kill him doesn't mean its ok for him to place a bomb near anyone. Are you actually stupid enough to think he was pointing out that it was ok to place bombs near people or are you just acting stupid because you have zero arguement and have to rely on putting words into people's mouth?
