McDonaldsGuy said:
Your third link pretty much proves me right: DNA has made it extremely improbable for innocent people to be executed. 15 years ago I would have been against the death penalty except for extreme cases, but now I feel it is accurate enough. |
Oh yeah? There are currently 32 death penalty cases being reviewed due to flawed testimony surrounding forensic evidence between 1980 and 2000. 14 of those convicted have already been executed or died in prison.
I also present you with the case of Cameron Todd Williams. Executed in 2004 for the murders of his three daughters after intentionally setting their house on fire. Except of course he didn't actually do that.
"accurate enough"...Those two words represent what I feel is an insurmountable difference in this disscussion. My opinion, if that there is no such thing as "accurate enough" when it comes to the state putting people to death. especially when there is no real societal benefit to putting people to death in the first place.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.