ChronotriggerJM on 30 April 2008
| endimion said: you pay 60 bucks for a game... you'll be able to play between 10 hours and 100 hrs at best and they ask you 45 to be able to play any games you like for as much time you want extending the original experience..... and people say it's too much I don't understand the argument..... and it is not even valid if they have one.... not from economical perspective..... |
Thats part of the problem though, on the PS3 I can play these games online, for free... on dedicated servers which generally support more people and less lag :/ The PC gaming community has been doing it for literal years. Why pay the $60 a year when you don't have to?
@Selnor, if "Home" doesn't fly, then what did we lose? Nothing? I know plenty of people that wouldn't mind using a service like home, and if they can tie it into most of they're online games, then the service will generate income. Even if it just puts you in a virtual lobby before the game starts, they can smack you with advertisements :P
From 0 to KICKASS in .stupid seconds.
