Arkham Knight runs like Assassin's Creed Unity on PC

[binary solo]

onionberry said:

binary solo said:

If your main beef is 30fps, then you have nothing to complain about. Low set performance parameters is nothing compared to actual bugs, glitches and gamebreaking faults.

lol obviously you're not a pc gamer, pc is an open platform so yeah that could be my main beef and I could complain about it because rocksteady is a competent development, i think. anyway my main beef like you said is gross motion blur and gross micro stuttering at 30 fps, it's a shitty port. more information here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2015/06/22/pc-version-of-batman-arkham-knight-is-hot-garbage-amd-and-nvidia-users-both-unhappy/

I am a PC gamer, but I eschew the PC master race BS. I am happy to play PC games on minimum setting because I think high performance gaming rigs are a waste of my money, and the excess is better spent buying a console that gives me a broader games library than an expensive gaming rig alone can provide. I absolutely hate the idea of 30fps on the one online MP game I do play (Smite) because it causes a major disadvantage in competitive play. So I recognise when 60 (or more) fps is important, but I also recognise when it is not. For a single player game like AK fps is irrelevant as long as its stable and it's at 30 or more, IMO of course. Now that you have identified other actually important issues you have a much stronger point. It was odd that in your first reply to me the only fault you mentioned was 30fps, when clearly there are more important problems than that.