Oyvoyvoyv said: In my paper there's a note. It's written by a journalist, not anyone working with the report. This is a rough translation. The leader of the "fitness crew" and the crew itself is unable to find any proof that Wii Fit is superior to a gym. The gym offers a 1/3 better burn rate than Wii Fit. Wii Fit is therefore only 75% as efficient as a gym. Edit: Argh, less than a minute too late. |
Hmm ok, wait a sec. The expert get an assigment to test it, from somebody who surly want to have it a negative result. He post his result that good (I would have figured 50% at most). So either he has done a fair job, or the tool is even better? Well, know I have really to do my daily there, seems to help.
@WoW
You know that gym can be a pain in the ass in some countries and territories? The nearest gym for me is 5 minutes away by car (not that far), but I should pay outstanding 50€/month. Personal trainer extra, off course. So I looked arround and the next gym is 25 minutes away by car, and I still have to pay 20€/month, but i have to join up for at least 2 years. No tell me, as somebody who didn't work out at all until know, do you think it is attractive. I have maybe 4 hours a week to do a workout (including driving). So Wii Fit is an alternative for me at least. Yes I know it is not that effective and good as gym, but com on, would you pay that much if you would do it that less?
Join up to the VGC Mario Kart Wii GP European League!
Or the VGC Mario Kart Wii GP Australian League!
Or the VGC Mario Kart Wii GP American League!
Or the VGC Halo 3 American League!
Or the VGC Call Of Duty PS3 League!