plip.plop said:
Rockstar would only sell either one DLC, timed exclusive? Hell no When you make a game that sells on any system it is put on, You hold all the cards. but game companies need not been arrogant as EA,Activision,SONY,Nintendo,Microsoft,TAKE-TWO,THQ,UBISOFT all know they need connections and support as they have fallen big time from their top position Even ROCKSTAR can't just depend on just GTA as gaming landscape and genre change fast and they need good relations to launch other games Don't believe me? Look at Call of Duty. The amount of money needed to hold a game off another console (temporarily) that has an user base that also buys the hell out of that game would be too high for either company. no it wouldn't be.Call of DUTY is a kids shooter game,they have absolutely no loyalty and fluctuate and X360 is big in NA and PS3 is big in EUROPE so they needed both consoles.if it was just NA,microsoft could have easily bought off acitvision exlcusivity and ACTIVISION is a much much different company from TAKE-TWO and ROCKSTAR,ACTIVISION has STARCRAFT,CALL OF DUTY,DIABLO,WARCRAFT,GUITAR HERO,DESTINY and was owned by a conglomerate Vivendi which are known for multiplatform game.Compare that with TAKE-TWO,owner of ROCKSTAR GAMES and their only major and proven franchise is GTA. Besides why waste that money locking up timed exclusivity, when you can fund new IP's, or does that scenario only apply to Sony's competitors.. LMAO.................waste money.the way you are saying the game is too big and then you say waste money on that game even DLC,Marketing and Bundle exclusivity for GTA would do grand things for PS4 or XBONE and a TIMED exclusivity of one year would make that platform the main gaming destination and put the generation handility in that platform's hand |