By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
DonFerrari said:

As far as I know it's Naughty Dog, not Uncharted that matters... they were record sellers with Crash, Jake, Uncharted and TLOU (which sold better than any uncharted)... so you are talking non-sense.

Sony doesn't relly on some franchise from several gens, besides GT because there is no point in changing name because it will be racing anyway.

Nintendo were profitable because of Handhelds not the consoles on those 2 generations. MS have lost a lot of money because of several issues on the gen. And PS2 had very health profits because of royalties... you don't need your 1st parties selling 20M if you can sell 7M and have several 3rds selling 5-25M paying you royalties...

I don't care about sales in this regard, I just play one console and 1 copy of the game so why should someone care about sales of SW and not HW? You either care about both or none... I don't get a cent of it, so as long as it's healthy and keeps getting releases to please me I'm ok.

Your argument is flawed based off this sentence quote

*Nintendo were profitable because of Handhelds not the consoles on those 2 generations. MS have lost a lot of money because of several issues on the gen*

Nintendo makes money on there consoles and there Software sales make a huge difference and thats there primary source of income, because alot of Nintendo franchises sell millions. There B grade franchises make up Uncharted sales. As for Xbox, you have no idea how much money MS rake in with Xbox Live. Imagine the income for 10 years with more then 10million subcribers paying $50 a year for Live. $50 x 10million over 10 years. At one stage MS had 55 million subcribers in 1 year. Sorry MS made a fortune on the 360 even with its unknown issues you speak of. PS2 and PS3 had no subs and there hardware was butchered so they could sell it and they sold there consoles at a loss. Halo 4 alone made $220million for Xbox. 

That certainly explain Nintendo profit for 3 years in a row. They sell million sw and don't take a hit in sw on this gen as well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."