By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SubiyaCryolite said:
JEMC said:

There's once thing I noticed and it's that both reviews give differrent results when it comes to power consumption. Guru3D has the 390X using less power than their 290X card, but Overclock3D has it using more.

I'm going to trust OC3D more.

Anyway, I'm going to pass on AMD's 3xx series. They're still too big and power hungry (aka hot) for my case.

Turns out the MSI card is overcocked, stock 390x performance is gerally behind that of the 980 (by 6%). I'll wait for the Nano.

I already assumed that the card would be overclocked, specially given that it's basically a 290X.

And yes, Nano would be better suited for my needs, but it will be more expensive and I agree with Tachi that it will be better to wait and see how the HBM cards reliability is.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.