| ItsaMii said: Bungie takes too much time to release their games. How about 3 years to make a port to PC? I know there is all that games for Vista thing, but they delayed the launch for several months. Halo 2 also do not improve that much to take 3 years. HALO is not a game that demands so much time on production (at least in single player) for it to take 3 years. I do not know about their experiments with multiplayer and the time with marketing, but 3 years to make a game like HALO is a lot. Do you really want to compare Halo to Half Life 2? Lets just say that both games have the same fun factor. Still, Halo is a game that has 4 kinds of enemies coming in various colors, 8 kind of guns, 10 levels of which 3 are just earlier levels backwards and can fit in a tiny CD. I will not go on about all aspects of HL2, but you can not even compare them with Halo. So do you think that the 3 years it take to make Halo 2 is ok? Can you compare the jump that HL made to HL2 and say the same about HALO and HALO 2? |
Sadly they don't really focus on the single player aspect of Halo. In Halo 1, the rooms were all identical... In Halo 2, you had to play as that stupid alien for half the time, laaame, and then they leave you with a cliffhanger.
I hope the single player in Halo 3 isn't totally worthless... Although I heard there might be online co-op... maybe that was something else. But it'd be neato.
