SamuelRSmith on 13 June 2015
| Aeolus451 said:
That seemed like a loaded question in my opinion. Some of the others seems like that too. Why can't the interests of trans-national corporations primairly serve humanity or sustain people's quality of life? It's making it seem like it's a "either or" situation when one is being worded to look bad to fix the outcome. Kinda like... Would you rather be rich and a morally bad person but lonely? or Would you rather be a good but poor person who is liked by most? |
Also some poor categorization going on.
"Charity is a better means of helping the poor than social security" (or something like that) under "religious questions". Honest mistake, or a false assumption relating to charity and religion?
