BraLoD said:
It's lovely to see how many people think it has to be the others screwing rather than Sony merit.
I mean, Sony never did a good thing, it can't be it...
It's not like it ever won a gen before, it got lucky.
I wonder why the company that came to a two sided market dependant on Japan and US, with it's first system opened it to the most of the world and made Europe such a relevant market, that was able to be the first to break the 100M barrier, which hadn't happened before even with all systems combined with it's first system, that was able to not only be relevant while being the underdog but also turn into the king in the same gen, that led us to over 50% boost in it past record from the last gen, with the still most successful and acclaimed system ever (!even in this Nintendo dominated forums), that was able to recover from an one year headstart with a start as bad as possible in the next gen and be competitive and end it with such a high note, that now delivered the most powerful and user friendly system from the get go, now rightly priced and focused on gaming as it core, how can it be winning? It obviously is because of the others screwing up, because you know, why not?
How is it not clear it's just the strongest brand, with the most merits and the best product this gen?
|
The truth hurts many people here and you can be sure that they don't have a good reply to give to your post.
