Dianko said:
It's arguable both ways. I don't agree with the redefinition of "casual gamer" personally. And GTA was the epitome of the casual game last gen - a game that appealed of large segment of gamers as well as those who were not so invested in it. Let me ask this question. Playing Wii Sports with family has definitely changed the equation of the gaming business. But how many of those parents do you think actively become consumers? Do you think they actually buy Zelda - not for their kids, but for themselves to play - after Wii Sports and Wii Play? I'd argue that these new gamers aren't really the new casual, they're fringe gamers. They play because it is a family activity that appeals to everyone, but outside of those constrainst, they aren't going to be purchasing anything for themselves. At the end of the day, I still think it's those that fit the definition of last gen's casuals that dictate purchasing. |
I agree with you that the new gamers likely will not go out and buy Zelda. At least not yet :)
But we are not talking about Zelda, we are talking about Mario Kart, with it's Wii wheel, 4-player split screen and gameplay that ensures new players will win the odd race against veterans, whist giving the hardcore features they want too. So it is also a family activity that appeals to everyone, which is why Nintendo calls it a 'bridge' title.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever." - Spinal Tap