Angelv577 said:
Wii U: few exclusives worth playing, no third party support = poor to average overall library + too expensive for what it has = it deserved the sales it has. PS4: few exclusives worth buying, excellent third party support (which are the real selling point between the masses)= better overall library than Wii U. As much as you want to think that third parties doesn't count, people look at the overall console library which by looking at the multiplatform sales, ps4 is the place to play those games. That maybe you don't like third parties games or see them as bad games, it doesn't matter, what really matter is what the masses want. xbox: has better games overall but nobody ask them to try to pull the DRM fiasco that nobody asked for. Now people got afraid that they might do it again. Criticize playstation all you want but at least in the console space, they have deliver in every generation. Even with the ps vita they at least tried but the sales of the games were poorly. it won't happen with ps4. And again the most important thing is the overall library which include both first parties + third parties. Wii U might have better exclusives than ps4 but overall which is what really matter, ps4 > Wii U. |
My point wasn´t that WiiU is a better console though, but calling PS4 "The best console by a long way" is just ... absurd imo
The console doesn´t do anything better than XBO, is just a bit more powerfull.... how can be the best by a long shot? All the problems with XBO at first don´t exists anymore, they share 95% of multiplatforms and xbo has more quality exclusives.
So ps4 is not the one with better exclusives (that´s wiiu) and it´s not the best balanced between exclusives/multiplatforms/price.... so how can be "the best console by a long way"?
I wasn´t saying that the console was bad per se or something like that.
