Dr.Vita said:
hatersgonnahate7 said:
Vita deserves even less than it did. It was an expensive handheld with no games. it had little to no support from sony since launch. there's no point in using the memory cards as excuses for it's failure, it lacks games.
Wii U on the other hand has the best games and the lowest price of the 8th gen + free online. It's trully a console for gamers and deserved much more. It's only selling bad because of sony and microsoft false advertising and ilegal bribery of third parties so they skip Wii U. also, "Now the Wii U has better support, but where MS is getting crap for releasing sequels, Nintendo does seem to come away with it easily." You know it's a pathetic OP when the main "argument" is 100% BS. it's amazing how not even haters can find negative things about nintendo games, so they complain about most being sequels, wich bears no relevance to game quality.
|
I am reading so much things which are wrong... You are praising the Wii U and hating the Vita...
- Vita got as much good AAA games from Sony as Wii U got from Nintendo (even if Vita games > Wii U games imo but everyone has a different opinion)
- Vita has much more new IP's than Wii U
- Vita has a better Third-Party support
- Vita and Wii U have both free online
- Vita and Wii U are both backward compatible
|
-Sony completely abandoned Vita and even cut some very imported features like YouTube or Maps.
-Nintendo giving 100% support to Wii U
