By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Qwark said:
Smear-Gel said:


New ip's in the same franchises are no different than old ip's in thecsame franchises

 

Or are you saying you'd enjoy Bloodborne less if it was exactly the same but called Dark Souls 4.

Considering it would have lost it's entire story and charm, new combat system, which doesn't involve a shield,  but does have guns, viceral attacks and trick weapons. Also that would include trading in the gothic, lovecraft atmosphere for another medieval atmosphere. Yes I would have liked it less. Bloodborne has elements from demon souls (let's stay with the mother game, which is way closer to dark souls if you would have played all). But saying it could be a direct succesor and called dark souls 4 in it's current form is kind of ridicilous.

They have similairities no doubt, but they are defenitly not the same game.

These are all stylistic changes excepting the lost of shield. Again, much like Super Mario Sunshine vs. Super Mario Galaxy. While the new experience felt fresh, the core of it wasn't anymore difference than each Mario, Xeno-, Legend of Zelda, etc, etc are from each-other.