taus90 said:
Well you cant be more wrong. Square did acknowledge that they had to shift staff from Nomura's team on to final fantasy 13, and it was a sensible business decision at that time coz Versus was a PS3 exclusive and 13 was not, so which would have been more benefinicial was not a suprise. and about finishing the game, when versus was re revealed as 15, the game looked long way into the development on a Direct X11 pc, and SE went and add more staff to complete the game as this was no longer an exclusive. But the problem started to arise when Nomura was told to alter the content and his vision as a numbered final fantasy couldnt be this dark, hence it was named Versus13 before. Nomura did tried his best to cut down the darkness and action element but that wasnt enought so SE replaced him and the result is in front of us |
I see. So Square told him that his "dark vision" for the game had to be changed despite SEVERAL quite dark concepts appearing in pretty much every game prior? And the name was Versus XIII because main series games couldn't be dark, NOT because it was part of what was to be a deeper spiritual Fabula Nova Crystallis (XIII) subseries? Yep, sure. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Occam's Razor is in full effect here. Square didn't want to spend 30 years on a three-game subseries again because that already failed once and took less time. They gave Nomura's position to his codirector because he didn't agree. Boom, problem solved. No conspiracy here. God forbid a mediocre director got removed because he got a Kojima complex.
You should check out my YouTube channel, The Golden Bolt! I review all types of video games, both classic and modern, and I also give short flyover reviews of the free games each month on PlayStation Plus to tell you if they're worth downloading. After all, the games may be free, but your time is valuable!







